comparison of two pain assessment tools, “facial expression” and “critical care pain observation tool” in intubated patients after cardiac surgery
Authors
abstract
background critical-care patients are at higher risk of untreated pain, because they are often unable to communicate owing to altered mental status, tracheal intubation and sedation. objectives this study compared two pain assessment tools on tracheal intubated critically ill patients in a cardiac post-anesthesia care unit, who were unable to communicate verbally. the studied tools were “critical-care pain observation tool (cpot)” and “facial expression (fe)”. patients and methods this was a prospective study based on diagnostic test evaluation. a sample of 91 intubated patients was selected from cardiac post-anesthesia care unit. collected data were demographic characteristics, vital signs, fe and cpot tools’ scale. pain was assessed with cpot and fe scores five times. the first assessment was performed in at least 3 hours after admission of patients to icu. then, the pain intensity was reassessed every 30 minutes. in addition, blood pressure, heart rate, respiratory rate and oxygen saturation were measured simultaneously. results at the first period, the frequency of “severe” pain intensity using the cpot was 58.2% and with the fe tool was 67% (p = 0.001). both tools demonstrated reduction in severity of pain on second and third assessment times. significantly increasing level of pain and blood pressure due to nursing painful procedures (endo-tracheal suctioning, changing patient’s position, etc.), were obtained by cpot in fourth assessment. fe was not able to detect such important findings (κ = 0.249). in the fifth step, pain intensity was reduced. the most agreement between the two tools was observed when the reported pain was “severe” (κ = 0.787, p < 0.001) and “mild” (κ = 0.851, p < 0.001). conclusions the sensitivity of cpot was higher for detection and evaluation of pain in intubated postoperative patients compared with “facial expression”. best agreement between these tools was observed in two extremes of pain intensity.
similar resources
Comparison of Two Pain Assessment Tools, "Facial Expression" and "Critical Care Pain Observation Tool" in Intubated Patients After Cardiac Surgery.
BACKGROUND Critical-care patients are at higher risk of untreated pain, because they are often unable to communicate owing to altered mental status, tracheal intubation and sedation. OBJECTIVES This study compared two pain assessment tools on tracheal intubated critically ill patients in a cardiac post-anesthesia care unit, who were unable to communicate verbally. The studied tools were "crit...
full textcomparison of bispectral index monitoring with the critical-care pain observation tool in the pain assessment of intubated adult patients after cardiac surgery
conclusions it appears that bis monitoring can be used for pain assessment along with the cpot tool in intubated patients, and it is much more sensitive than monitoring of hemodynamic changes. bis monitoring can be used more efficiently in intubated patients under deep sedation in the icu. materials and methods seventy consecutive patients who underwent cardiac surgery (coronary artery bypass g...
full textThe Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool: A useful tool for pain assessment in intensive care units
Pain is a major concern in all intensive care units (ICUs). The proper assessment and management of pain is one of the main goals of patient care in ICUs. Improper evaluation of pain and its over or under treatment can cause significant problems in the process of patient management in ICU. Since most ICU patients are unable to communicate correctly with the ICU team and explain their level of p...
full textComparison of Bispectral Index Monitoring With the Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool in the Pain Assessment of Intubated Adult Patients After Cardiac Surgery
BACKGROUND Detecting pain is crucial in sedated and mechanically ventilated patients, as they are unable to communicate verbally. OBJECTIVES This study aimed to compare Bispectral index (BIS) monitoring with the Critical-care pain observation tool (CPOT) and vital signs for pain assessment during painful procedures in intubated adult patients after cardiac surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS Sev...
full textComparing the Persian version properties of Behavioral Pain Scale and Critical Care Pain Observation Tool in patients with head trauma
Introduction: The assessment of pain in critically ill patients requires careful examination, especially in intubated and traumatic head patients due to the impossibility of using verbal pain scales and changes in non-verbal communication due to the type of injury sustained .The purpose of this study was to compare the psychometric properties of the Persian version of Behavioral Pain Scale (BPS...
full textPain Measurement in Mechanically Ventilated Patients After Cardiac Surgery: Comparison of the Behavioral Pain Scale (BPS) and the Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool (CPOT).
OBJECTIVES The Behavioral Pain Scale (BPS) and Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool (CPOT) are behavioral pain assessment tools for sedated and unconscious critically ill patients. The aim of this study was to compare the reliability, internal consistency, and discriminant validation of the BPS and the CPOT simultaneously in mechanically ventilated patients after cardiac surgery. DESIGN A pros...
full textMy Resources
Save resource for easier access later
Journal title:
anesthesiology and pain medicineجلد ۶، شماره ۱، صفحات ۰-۰
Hosted on Doprax cloud platform doprax.com
copyright © 2015-2023